The author outlined Morita therapy-based living-guidance (yojo) and inpatient treatment for depressed patients. He further discussed commonalities and differences between Morita therapy and "the third generation" of cognitive-behavioral therapies, such as behavioral activation (BA) and mindfulness-based cognitive therapy (MBCT). Both Morita therapy and BA share at least a common view that it is effective to activate patients' constructive behavior at a certain point in depression treatment. In a corresponding manner, as MBCT emphasizes the "being" mode and Morita therapy, "arugamama, or being as is," they both state that the turning point to break the vicious cycle (or "doing" mode) is accepting thoughts and emotions as they are.
 However, Morita therapists, compared with BA therapists, seem to pay more attention to the necessity of resting and appropriate timing for introducing behavioral activation. MBCT has patients concentrate their attention on their own aspirations and bodily sensations (meditation), while in Morita therapy, their attentions are naturally diverted through the practice of daily life.
 Besides the differences of cultural backgrounds, there seem to be differences in depression models between Morita therapy and "the third generation" of CBT. In the BA model, the cause of depression lies in a lack of positive reinforcement, and negative reinforcement resulting from the avoidance of the experience of discomfort. The cognitive theory of depression places the model of the vicious cycle among the elements of cognition, emotion, and behavior. In this regard, MBCT shares a common assumption regarding the pathogenesis of depression with conventional cognitive therapy. As BA and MBCT are based on psychological models of depression, both treatments have been primarily practiced by clinical psychologists. On the other hand, medical doctors mainly offer a psychotherapeutic approach with medication treatments for depressive patients in Japan. In this context, the practice of treating depression is based primarily on medical models of endogenous depression. This is also true of Morita therapy, but in a broad sense. While those who follow medical models in a narrow sense try to identify the cause of illness and then to remove it, Morita therapists pay more attention to the recovery process rather than the pathogeneses of depression and attempt to promote patients' natural healing-power. Therefore, it may be more appropriate to refer to the model used in Morita therapy as "a resilience model".
 <Author's abstract>