Advertisement第120回日本精神神経学会学術総会

Abstract

第117巻第2号

※会員以外の方で全文の閲覧をご希望される場合は、「電子書籍」にてご購入いただけます。
The Problems with Domestic Introduction of rTMS from the Three Viewpoints of Scientific Evidence, Specialty and Social Responsibility
Kazuhiro SHINOSAKI
Wakayama Medical University, Neuropsychiatry
Psychiatria et Neurologia Japonica 117: 126-131, 2015

 The domestic introduction of rTMS is expected as a new treatment option for treatment-resistant depression. I discussed some problems with the introduction from three viewpoints: scientific evidence, specialty, and social responsibility. I surveyed scientific evidence for rTMS regarding the action mechanism, effectiveness, side effects, and its positioning in the treatment guidelines. To secure the quality of rTMS treatment, I proposed rTMS guidelines, nurturing of the specialists, and a center hospital plan, and pointed out some medium-term problems after its introduction and the consistency of rTMS treatment and standard depression treatment. From the viewpoint of social responsibility, rTMS treatment should be a medical service covered by health insurance to avoid its misuse. We should prepare to overcome the public suspicion of brain stimulation treatment for mental disease.
 <Author's abstract>

Keywords:transcranial magnetic stimulation, depression, effectiveness, guideline, social responsibility>
Advertisement

ページの先頭へ

Copyright © The Japanese Society of Psychiatry and Neurology