Advertisement第120回日本精神神経学会学術総会

Abstract

第113巻第3号

Views on the New Psychiatric Specialist Certification System from the Perspective of those Experiencing the Postgraduate Psychiatric Training System in Japan
Wakako UMENE-NAKANO1,6, Naoki UCHIDA2,6, Takahiro KATO3,6, Masaru TATENO4, Ryohei MATSUMOTO5,6, Jun NAKAMURA1
1 Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, University of Occupational and Environmental Health
2 Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, Fukuoka University
3 Department of Neuropsychiatry, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University
4 Department of Neuropsychiatry, Sapporo Medical University
5 Department of Psychiatry, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine
6 A Nonprofit Organization, the Japan Young Psychiatrists Organization
Psychiatria et Neurologia Japonica 113: 271-276, 2011

 The psychiatric specialist certification system of the Japanese Society of Psychiatry and Neurology was established in 2005, with a transitional period that ran until 2008. A threeyear postgraduate training scheme was started in connection with the new psychiatric specialist certification system, and the first formal examination under the new system was held in 2010. A resident desiring certification as a psychiatric specialist must purchase a psychiatric specialist certification handbook and present it when taking the examination. There are many differences between the new examination and the transitional period examination,in terms of both the handbook and the number of case reports to be submitted. Results of a survey conducted on 360 psychiatrists belonging to either university or national hospitals, all of whom had undergone psychiatric training within the past eight years, revealed that there was currently a lack of knowledge, and low rate of utilization, of the handbook.
 The primary author was in the first cohort of those who began postgraduate psychiatric training in a university hospital and subsequently took the first examination administered after the transition period. The author has maintained that, based on personal experience, a number of issues need improvement,such as the large number of grading items to be signed off on by supervising psychiatrists, and complications involving the outline of cases to be experienced. Additionally, it was thought to be difficult for supervisors who had obtained their specialist certification via the transitional period examination to have an adequate understanding of the outline of the new examination.Therefore,it is important that residents themselves take a more assertive attitude to becoming specialists. In the future,in order to establish a sound specialist certification system, the results of this survey of physicians who took the new examination should be taken into account.

Keywords:postgraduate training, psychiatric specialist certification system, psychiatry, attitude survey, Resident>
Advertisement

ページの先頭へ

Copyright © The Japanese Society of Psychiatry and Neurology