Why are patients with depression so disappointed with their psychiatric treatment ? One of the causes of their disappointment is a ‘bogus contract’(Smith,2001)between patients and psychiatrists. Patients tend to idealize modern psychiatry as if it could solve many of their problems, including social ones. Psychiatrists, however, know that modern psychiatry has limited powers and that they cannot solve all problems, especially social ones. There is a huge mismatch between what psychiatrists are trained for and what they are required to do. In fact, the biological model of depression is inadequate to help depressive patients, particularly patients with psycho-social problems. It has long been believed that antidepressant medications represent the best established treatment for major depressive disorder. Recent meta-analyses(Kirsch et al., 2008; Fournier et al., 2010), however, found little evidence that anti-depressants have a specific pharmacological effect relative to a pill placebo for patients with mild or moderate symptoms. This may be owing partly to the fact that depression is associated with ineluctable life events like separation, interpersonal conflicts, unexpected adversities, etc., that are central to being human. Both patients and psychiatrists should be aware of the limitations of psychiatric treatment. A more realistic relationship is required between patients and psychiatrists. Psychiatrists should be open about their limitations. Patients cannot leave social problems to psychiatrists. However, some chronically depressed patients may be capable of managing their social problems. In such cases,respecting patients’autonomy promotes clinical practice and prevents them from entering a state of chronic patienthood.
A Bogus Contract between Psychiatrists and Patients with Depression
Department of Psychiatry, Dokkyo Koshigaya Hospital, Dokkyo Medical University
Psychiatria et Neurologia Japonica
112: 1084-1090, 2010
<Keywords:depression, anti-depressants, diagnosis, bogus contract, autonomy>